You are here: Home / News Reports / Whistleblower claims girl was abused by grooming gang after his concerns were 'not listened to'

Whistleblower claims girl was abused by grooming gang after his concerns were 'not listened to'

... instead of swift intervention from social services or police, the housing officer was later ordered to stop sending the emails after a complaint was made to his bosses at Oxford City Council.


The head of Birmingham’s new Children’s Trust allegedly failed to tackle concerns that a 13-year-old girl was being abused by a grooming gang in another city.

Andy Couldrick was running children’s social care at Oxfordshire County Council when ex-detective Dermot Norridge first alerted authorities about the youngster being sexually exploited.

The former child abuse unit officer claims he spoke directly on the phone to the council chief, urging immediate action to protect the girl, as well as sending emails to him and other senior officials.

But instead of swift intervention from social services or police, the housing officer was later ordered to STOP sending the emails after a complaint was made to his bosses at Oxford City Council.

His sexual exploitation warnings in 2007 were later revealed in a serious case review of the failings of the county council and police in the grooming gangs scandal, which may have seen 370 children abused.

Seven men were jailed in 2013 for sickening crimes against multiple victims, including 25 attacks on the girl Mr Norridge had been trying to protect.

Although the Serious Case Review concluded in March 2015 that no individual could be blamed for the failings, it admitted there had been failings in the way Mr Norridge’s concerns were dealt with.

“A City Crime and Neighbourhood Nuisance Officer was hugely concerned about a particular child and escalated (his concerns) to senior staff in other agencies, but not within his own,” the review confirmed.

“The Nuisance Officer was a former Detective Sergeant and acting Detective Inspector with experience in child protection sections of the Police. In 2007-8, he repeatedly raised concerns with senior CSC and Police staff, including the then Director of Children’s Services, about a particular child.

His warnings, said the review, were “describing her behaviour and associates which today would lead to a speedy recognition that something bigger might be happening, but which at the time led to rather harsh disregard and criticism.”

In one instance, it added, “one CSC response to concerns about sexual association with adults said: “The innuendo relating to her alleged associates I find a little presumptive and unsavoury, and does not in my view indicate a significant prima facie risk of harm.

“Another email said that ‘the evidence beyond innuendo remains thin’. By this point there were numerous reports collated by the Nuisance Officer of association by the then 14-year-old, late at night, with adult men.”

“The County’s Head of Adult Social Services was asked by the CSC Head of Service, through his contacts with the City, to complain about the Nuisance Officer’s emails and style, and the City senior manager apologised for ‘the attitude of the staff member and for the unprofessional way he has acted. I am most upset that an officer under my control could act in this matter, and apologise to your staff unreservedly. Please be assured I have taken strong action to ensure this does not happen again.’

“The worker was asked to stop emailing, but not told that his concerns were inappropriate. It is likely though that his managers assumed that the Police and CSC would be doing the right thing as it was their responsibility, and so did not take up the issues themselves.

“Whatever the style of the Nuisance Officer concerned, he was trying to get a child protected, and responses received (including turning down a case conference request) show one reason why the full picture of CSE was delayed.”

Mr Couldrick issued a statement at that time, saying the report did “not paint a picture of the concerns raised in 2007 that I recognise entirely. The concerns were not ignored, but different decisions were taken.

“At this time, the periods she was missing were becoming less frequent. This led to us continuing with what turned out to be the wrong approach. We did not understand this type of abuse and its scale at that time, and were focused on individual young people.

“Like everyone else, I deeply regret that we didn’t have the correct information to enable us to see the patterns and the whole picture during this period. If we had, we could have done something about it and stopped it then and there.

“What happened in Oxfordshire was harrowing for the young victims. I’ve always been, and will continue to be, committed to protecting children from harm in order to help our most vulnerable.”

Mr Couldrick left Oxfordshire County Council in 2011 to become Wokingham Borough Council’s chief executive. He was appointed chief executive of Birmingham Children’s Trust in May last year, a position which pays a salary of up to £157,000 a year.

The Trust was set up to run Birmingham’s failing Children’s Services, which has consistently been branded inadequate by Ofsted.

As part of his role, Mr Couldrick will be responsible for overseeing the protection of vulnerable children, including those at risk of child sexual exploitation (CSE).

Why Muslims Kill For Islam

The book has now been re-printed and customers all over the world can now buy Mohammed's Koran (the No.1 best-seller banned by Amazon).


If you wonder if the book Mohammed's Koran is for you, read the 100s of five-star reviews the book received in its first few months on sale.

Amazon banned the sale of the only book on Islam that proves Islam has been a terrorist ideology since Year 1 of the Islamic calendar.  The book denounces violence and hatred, yet has been described as offensive by Amazon.  Meanwhile Amazon still sell copies of "Mein Kampf" (which advocates gassing Jews) and Amazon still sell books like "The Anarchist Cookbook" which (a bomb-making manual, the possession of which has led to terrorism charges in the UK).  Ebay has even banned the sale of used copies of Mohammed's Koran.  And from day one Google banned adverts for the book (instead the UK government spent a small fortune buying the top advertising slot to push their video begging people not to read the book).  Amazon staff are on record as saying that the order to ban the book came "from above Amazon". The propaganda from the state and the censorship from their tax-avoiding chums confirms the argument of Mohammed's Koran - the elite have knowingly invited this terrorist ideology into the West and they have sided with the terrorist ideology against the victims of terrorism.

With all this censorship you may not have heard of my new book (co-authored with Tommy Robinson). It was published at the end of July 2017.  The book went straight to No.1 on Amazon, and stayed there until the initial print-run of 5000 books sold out a few days later. For most of the following 18 months it was the No.1 best-selling Koran.  Muslims hated this fact.

The British media never reported on the book going straight to No.1.  They only reported on the book once sales of it had been banned.  

`The Koran, Decoded

Contact Peter McLoughlin

Email pmclauth a t gmail . com

Considering that Twitter and Facebook have banned me, YouTube has removed entire channels, and Google deliberately promotes Islam in discussions of Islam and terrorism, it's only right to do my social networking on a site that really seems to stand by the concept of freedom of speech. You can find me at .