You are here: Home / News Reports / ‘Councillors aware of abuse scandal details but were told to keep quiet’

‘Councillors aware of abuse scandal details but were told to keep quiet’

Bit by bit, the full complicity of councils, Parliament, charities and news media will all come out. It might take another 10 years. Four years ago I published the first edition of my book on this subject. To this day, it's still the most complete picture of who knew what and when. I expect the book to still be at the cutting edge a decade after it was first published. Since there are news reports of court cases in Rotherham as far back as 1975, what's the excuse for the following 35 years that the local media failed to mount any campaigns about these rape gangs? Is there any clearer evidence that these "brave journalists" are nothing but compliant agents of the state? As far back as 2007 The Times carried a story about how the mothers in the Rotherham area were conducting their own surveillance of the gangs, but the police would do nothing. Did Rotherham councillors not read The Times story about their area, did they not realise that it was a lie that the police were taking "appropriate measures". For the police, "appropriate measures" meant prosecuting and imprisoning those who campaigned about the rape gangs. It certainly did not mean protecting the schoolgirls from rape on "an industrial scale".


Councillors were told details of the Rotherham child sex exploitation scandal nearly 10 years ago, a veteran former politician admitted to an angry crowded public meeting. Details of the abuse were revealed to them in a secret 2005 seminar – but councillors were told to keep quiet, so as not to ‘jeopardise police investigations’, former councillor Brian Cutts, aged 81, said. “There is not a single person in this room who didn’t know what was going on at the time,” he told yesterday’s cabinet meeting.

Several current and former members admitted attending the seminar – but insisted they were ordered not to act. Members of the authority’s cabinet met yesterday for the first time since the Jay Report, to discuss revelations about the abuse of 1,400 girls over 16 years between 1997 and 2013. Deputy council leader Paul Lakin told the public he was ‘deeply sorry’ for the ‘inexcusable and unacceptable’ failure to protect young people. Former councillor Mr Cutts said: “I knew about the abuse eight years ago. It is this chamber that is responsible for the failings. “There is not a single person in this room who didn’t know what was going on at the time. Does this council not feel it should stand down?” The admission prompted members of the public to call for the arrest of Mr Cutts, with cries of, “You should be arrested and put in prison, why didn’t you do anything?”.

Coun Ken Wyatt told the meeting he too was at the seminar, but said the advice was not to speak out. “Yes. We were aware that it was happening from the seminar,” he said, but added he was not aware of the scale. “We were assured at the seminar the police were watching and taking appropriate measures. We were told any information we released would jeopardise the police inquiry.” Coun Sue Ellis admitted she was also at the seminar. She said: “It would be a very brave person that went out and jeopardised the prosecutions.

“If you are asking, ‘Would I do things differently now?’, of course I would. We have all failed people in Rotherham.” Three members of the public stormed out of the meeting, one shouted, “I have had enough. Resign all of you. Hang your heads in shame.” Coun Lakin told The Star afterwards the secret seminar was ‘part of normal council procedure’. “It’s not unusual that information is shared with councillors on a need-to-know basis. There has to be some system that allows members to discuss issues on a need-to-know basis. They may contain personal information for instance.” He said more investigations are ongoing following the four Labour councillor suspensions.

Why Muslims Kill For Islam

The book has now been re-printed and customers all over the world can now buy Mohammed's Koran (the No.1 best-seller banned by Amazon).


If you wonder if the book Mohammed's Koran is for you, read the 100s of five-star reviews the book received in its first few months on sale.

Amazon banned the sale of the only book on Islam that proves Islam has been a terrorist ideology since Year 1 of the Islamic calendar.  The book denounces violence and hatred, yet has been described as offensive by Amazon.  Meanwhile Amazon still sell copies of "Mein Kampf" (which advocates gassing Jews) and Amazon still sell books like "The Anarchist Cookbook" which (a bomb-making manual, the possession of which has led to terrorism charges in the UK).  Ebay has even banned the sale of used copies of Mohammed's Koran.  And from day one Google banned adverts for the book (instead the UK government spent a small fortune buying the top advertising slot to push their video begging people not to read the book).  Amazon staff are on record as saying that the order to ban the book came "from above Amazon". The propaganda from the state and the censorship from their tax-avoiding chums confirms the argument of Mohammed's Koran - the elite have knowingly invited this terrorist ideology into the West and they have sided with the terrorist ideology against the victims of terrorism.

With all this censorship you may not have heard of my new book (co-authored with Tommy Robinson). It was published at the end of July 2017.  The book went straight to No.1 on Amazon, and stayed there until the initial print-run of 5000 books sold out a few days later. For most of the following 18 months it was the No.1 best-selling Koran.  Muslims hated this fact.

The British media never reported on the book going straight to No.1.  They only reported on the book once sales of it had been banned.  

`The Koran, Decoded

Contact Peter McLoughlin

Email pmclauth a t gmail . com

Considering that Twitter and Facebook have banned me, YouTube has removed entire channels, and Google deliberately promotes Islam in discussions of Islam and terrorism, it's only right to do my social networking on a site that really seems to stand by the concept of freedom of speech. You can find me at .