You are here: Home / Media


Silence of Local News Media in England

Why were the local news media silent about the grooming gangs, when there was data demonstrating their existence from as early as the 1980s?

One thing that becomes clear from my analysis in Easy Meat, is that the for decades local journalists/editors must have heard about the Muslim grooming gangs in their area. So why were they not investigating these gangs? If they'd done this, then the national media could not have failed to notice reports in Bradford, Blackburn, Bristol, Birmingham, Leicester, Rotherham, etc.  I'm now asking local news media questions about the grooming gangs in their area. I'll update this page if/when I get responses.

The current staff at these newspapers may have only worked there for the last couple of years. But they should be asking: why was my newspaper silent? What inside knowledge did my predecessor have that we kept hidden?

Here's a question to The Sheffield Star, asking why the local media ignored what was going on for so long.

 Sheffield Star: Why Did Local News Media Ignore Grooming Gangs 1

Here's a question to a senior reporter at The Sheffield Star. I expect that even questions like this, which do not question the role of local news media in facilitating these gangs, will go unanswered.

Question To Rotherham Reporter About Number of Grooming Gangs in Rotherham

The public will have to judge for themselves: just how pivotal to the concealment of this decades-long national scandal was the universal silence of the local media? Just how complicit were they? Why have police and social workers come in for censure, when the local news media have not?

My Dangerous Loverboy

Video commissioned in 2008 by UK national police agency to be shown to schoolgirls to cut off the supply to the gangs. Because of political correctness the video was never shown in schools. An even more misleading video was distributed some years later.

Below is the version provided by Sikh Awareness Society. They edited this 2008 video commission by the UK Human Trafficking Centre and added subtitles, making up for how coy and misleading this video was.

The details of the commissioning of this video in 2008 and the continuing failure to protect the schoolgirl victims by distributing the video to schools, are discussed in my book Easy Meat. The title of the book shows that police agencies and child-care professionals in Britain knew about the international angles of the grooming gang scandal. A later version of the video was released in 2012, but bearing so little relationship to the grooming gang phenomenon that it would be laughable if the problem was not so serious.

Gavin Boby with Michael Coren (2014) Discussing Grooming Gangs in England

Interview following the publication of the first version of "Easy Meat" in 2014.

Gavin Boby, of the Law And Freedom Foundation talks to Michael Coren about the Muslim grooming gangs in England.

Gavin Boby with Jamie Glazov (2014) Discussing Grooming Gangs in England

Interview following the publication of the first version of "Easy Meat" in 2014.

Gavin Boby, of the Law And Freedom Foundation, in interview with Jamie Glazov.

Gavin Boby with Jamie Glazov (2016)

Gavin Boby is interviewed by Jamie Glazov about the new edition of my 2014 report into the grooming gang phenomenon. A core element of this scandal, is the way the authorities in Britain concealed what was going on.

Interview with Leo Hohmann

CBN News - report on the grooming gang epidemic in England

George Igler gives a good interview.

Interview with Shazia Hobbs of AltNewsMedia

21st March 2018

I came across Peter McLoughlin, author of ‘Easy Meat’ and one of the authors of ‘Mohammed’s Koran – Why Muslims kill for Islam,’ on Twitter. His Twitter feed, to my knowledge, never ‘incited hate’ yet Twitter suspended him permanently as did Facebook for telling the truth about the Muslim rape gangs.

  1. Why do you think the full extent of the situation in Telford wasn’t identified earlier?

In the 2014 edition of Easy Meat Telford was already discussed.  But in 2014 no-one had any real evidence of the scale of the grooming phenomenon in Telford or elsewhere, and that was because none of the professional organisations had bothered to keep any data.  I noted how books by academics as late as 2009 managed to artfully describe the grooming gang phenomenon whilst avoiding any mention of the fact that the victims were almost always white working class girls and the perpetrators were almost always Asian or African Muslims.  From 2009 to 2011 when the marches of the English Defence League put the grooming gangs on the agenda (just as those marches once again put the problem of FGM on the agenda), professional police agencies and NGOs scrambled to claim they had never before heard of this grooming phenomenon.  In Easy Meat I set about proving that this was a tissue of lies, a fabrication which any journalist could easily pick apart should they so wish. But for decades the entire news industry was equally complicit and chose to abandon those working class girls to this fate.

As I pointed out in 2014, the police organisations had clearly known about the grooming phenomenon for many years. By 2007 part of the Serious Organised Crime Agency had already commissioned a short educational film to be shown in schools. The obvious aim of that video was to cut off the supply of victims to the gangs by teaching schoolgirls to understand the traps set by the gangs. Of course, that educational video was never shown in schools nor on TV, thus ensuring that the gangs could continue to prey on victims across the entire country.  The key question people should be asking themselves is this: which organisations had the power to ensure that schoolgirls never got to see that video designed to protect them from the gangs.  The same organisations who had the power to stop that video from being viewed are the same organisations who fund antifa in the UK.  That the Left have sacrificed so many schoolgirls to rapists demonstrates that the Left have no principle but the acquisition of power by any means necessary.  When a victim group are no longer useful to the Left, that victim group is abandoned.

We can be confident that however large the problem is in Rochdale or Rotherham or Oxford or Newcastle or Telford, the problem is far greater in areas with a higher density of Muslims.  In those areas there will be Muslims related to the rapists who are in powerful positions in local or national politics, or who are major donors to political parties, or who work for the police or CPS or NGOs.  Their domination in such towns and cities is so great that the grooming scandal in those areas will probably never be revealed to any extent.  Bradford and Birmingham were among the first places where the evidence publicly surfaced, but to this day Muslims and their allies in those areas are able to suppress any investigations, as Colin Cramphorn and so-called antifa did in Bradford in 2004.  That police in the Birmingham area pursued a TV company for a documentary revealing the insurrection being planned in mosques rather than pursue the Muslim grooming gangs in their area should tell us all we need to know about the priorities of the police in Muslim-dominated enclaves.

2.  A variety of police forces have released the findings of their investigations into why these young girls were failed, the most famous of these is perhaps the Bullfinch report that came out of Oxford. Police stated that a break in the communication chain between themselves, schools, nurses, social services, parents etc all led to young girls being groomed and raped.  They have since initiated, and apparently implemented, a strategy to ensure better overall communication between everyone responsible for the safe-guarding of children in order to ensure children are better protected.  Did police in other areas of the UK pick up on Bullfinch and attempt to implement it in their areas?

This is window-dressing.  After the furore created by the alliance between antifa and West Yorkshire police over the 2004 Channel 4 documentary on  Muslim grooming gangs in Bradford, that particular police force closed down their investigative unit, claiming there was no evidence that there were any grooming gangs!  To this day mothers in that area are demanding an inquiry about the failures of the police and the government, and these mothers are getting no support from anyone.

For decades now there has been a determination by the agents of the state that they will not see what is going on.  That the Serious Organised Crime Agency was able to commission My Dangerous Loverboy by 2007 is ample proof that the police knew what was going on (the first version of the video was ready by July 2008).  The single largest chapter of Easy Meat documents in forensic detail how from the early 1990s onwards all these different state-funded agencies knew about the grooming gang phenomenon. But after 2009 they all pretended they hadn’t known. In the four years since Easy Meat was first published, there has not been one attempt to refute the evidence contained in the book.  In the run-up to the BBC’s recent drama and documentary about the grooming gangs, I was repeatedly approached by the BBC for input, but due to family circumstances I was unable to do more than provide them with free copies of Easy Meat.  Naturally, my book has received no credit.

Rather than now try and bring all these disparate groups together, introducing more bureaucracy and more opportunities for passing the buck, the simple solution to the problem – instructing potential victims about how the gangs operate – was quietly shelved.  Muslims and their allies will not allow anything to tarnish the image of Islam and its followers. Which organisation is now overseeing the pursuit of grooming gangs in the UK?  The National Crime Agency.  And what is the National Crime Agency?  It is just a re-brand of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, the very organisation who produced that instructional video a decade ago.  This re-brand is just another slight of hand by the establishment.  They had to re-brand SOCA as NCA to conceal that over a decade ago SOCA was fully aware of the Muslim grooming gangs.  Back then SOCA did no data collection, no press conferences. They didn’t even make a fuss when their (taxpayer-funded) warning video went unseen.  They knew what the problem was, they knew that the potential victims were being kept in the dark.  And SOCA remained silent. Is it accidental that the very Parliamentary Bill which created SOCA in the first place was also one of the Bills which attempted to criminalise those who criticised Islam?  Instead of pursuing the disclosure of reality all leadership in Britain is dedicated to misleading the public.

3. Are there other plans similar to Bullfinch that you know of?

After permitting Muslim gangs to trap and rape non-Muslim schoolgirls for the best part of 5 decades, with far less than 1% of the perpetrators going to prison, I am certain that the agents of the state are not going to behave significantly differently.  They can’t be bothered to bring prosecutions for FGM where the evidence is tangible and where specific laws against this mutilation have existed for over 4 decades.  These multi-decade scandals are now too large to be exposed and the abuses of the legal process we have seen for decades are only going to continue.  The grooming gang scandal was not addressed when the Muslim population had 1/10th of the power they have now, so there is no reason to expect any change in direction.  That the “independent inquiry” into this scandal lost leader after leader (with one leader leaving allegedly saying that the problem came down to the UK having too many Asians) shows that the problems of Islamisation will only continue and only get worse.  All the evidence is that this independent inquiry is going to be a whitewash, with the grooming gang scandal submerged by as many other forms of child abuse as possible.

The hot air around Bullfinch is just that. As I pointed out in the second edition of Easy Meat, before the 2015 General Election PM David Cameron promised legislation that would lead to the imprisonment of police and social workers who did not act on information about grooming. This promise by Cameron was only reported in an interview by the BBC (which might as well be considered a branch of the state), with Cameron saying the grooming gang problem was as serious as terrorism. Have you since seen any sign of this proposed legislation?  Have you seen anyone other than me point out Cameron’s hollow promises on this matter?  Instead of the Muslim grooming gangs being treated as terrorists, it is Tommy Robinson who is slandered by the state and the media as a terrorist.  Robinson’s EDL should be credited with forcing Times’ journalist Andrew Norfolk out of his years of silence, when by Norfolk’s own admission he was repeatedly hearing about Muslim grooming gangs between 2004 and 2009.  And what was one of the major actions in the state slandering Tommy Robinson?  The 2018 Colin Cramphorn memorial lecture, given by the police officer in charge of counter-terrorism on whose watch Islamic terrorism had expanded beyond all imagination.  Remember who Cramphorn was?  The Chief Constable who in 2004 worked with Leftists to ensure that the first TV documentary to discuss the Muslim grooming gangs should be branded as racist, and that it should not be seen until after elections (when elections are the very point at which a true democracy would have used the appropriate mechanism to address this political problem).  If any single individual can be blamed for the cover-up and the continuation of the grooming gang scandal, it is Cramphorn – a man who was showered with gongs for his service to the state.  There should be no doubt that the police force are an extension of the political parties and both police and political parties work hand-in-hand with so-called antifa.

With Telford now in the news we are told that hundreds of referrals were ignored.  We still have a former socialist Home Secretary (the man who first used the phrase “easy meat” a decade ago) appearing on national TV tip-toeing around what the possible cultural factors could be which unite so many Muslim men to group together to rape white working-class schoolgirls.  What has come out recently about Telford sounds like a re-run of stories from Bradford twenty years ago.  Nothing can change because the ruling elite are never going to allow their Muslim allies to be seen in an accurate but negative light.  As I show in Easy Meat, the Labour government spent the best part of a decade trying to introduce laws to criminalise anyone who pointed out that the grooming gangs were predominantly Muslim.  The destruction of freedom of speech and the cover-up of the rape of schoolgirls are directly connected.

4. We rarely hear about the forgotten victims who are the boys. In your experience of researching how probable is this?

Once again, there is a dearth of information, so we can only speculate about the proportion of schoolboys raped by grooming gangs.  We taxpayers fund a veritable army of state employees to look after children and to bring wrong-doing to the attention of the judicial system. And with very rare exceptions this army of state agents ensure they see nothing and ensure they collect no data about this outrage, even though there are a variety of documents that prove this scandal goes back to the 1980s and the 1970s.   It seems our modern Corporatist state has learned from the actions of the National Socialists, and the army of state agents keep no records of events that they are told to keep hidden.  Those few whistleblowers were sacked and silenced.

However, it would seem unlikely to me that the grooming of boys was happening at a higher rate than the grooming of girls. From the 1970s until recent years police would have been far more concerned with homosexuality than with underage (non-consensual) sex between a Muslim man and schoolgirl. For instance, as recently as the late 1980s Greater Manchester Police and the courts sent adult homosexuals to prison for lengthy sentences simply for having consensual sado-masochistic sex.  The lawyers for the gay men argued that the violence between these consenting adults was far less than the violence inflicted by one man upon another in a boxing match, but the judge ruled that the violence was not comparable because boxing was “a manly pursuit”. Even appeals as high as the European Court of Human Rights in the 1990s did not recognise that these adult men had the right to consent to acts inducing pain. Yet we are told by the English courts that schoolgirls (for whom giving consent was a legal impossibility) were consenting to rape, torture and degradation at the hands of Muslim grooming gangs.

If a white schoolboy was to claim that he’d been raped repeatedly (something that would probably be quite clear from an examination of his anus), the police would probably take it more seriously than if a white girl reported that she’d been forced to have sex against her will. Moreover, given the near universal hatred of Muslims for homosexuality; it seems unlikely to me that some groomer would be considered admirable by his Muslim peers for seducing a schoolboy, and it is also unlikely that there would be a queue of other Muslims who would pay to rape this boy.  I have seen no evidence to make me question these expectations. There may well be schoolboy victims, but I expect they would be very much the exception.  For every forgotten victim who was a schoolboy I would expect perhaps hundreds of forgotten victims who were schoolgirls.  If data eventually proves me wrong on the proportion of schoolboy victims, then I would say that was further evidence that the Muslim grooming gangs were seeing the rape of these children as acts of war, where normal values are superseded by a different moral order.

5. Do you believe if this was affecting mostly middle class or Muslim children it would be have been dealt with swiftly?  Is there a class issue in play here?

The Conservative MP for Telford is on record as saying that the gangs are targeting white working-class schoolgirls, echoing the Labour MP for Blackburn who had already said 10 years ago that Pakistani gangs saw white schoolgirls as “easy meat”.  Political correctness puts white people at the bottom of any hierarchy of suffering.  The white working class in Britain are now the most despised group in their own country, thanks to decades of denigration of the British in general and of the working class in particular.  The bourgeois Left have never forgiven the working class for supporting Margaret Thatcher in preference to a Bolshevik revolution. The middle class applaud themselves as Brits by thinking they are at least cosmopolitan and internationalist, unlike the working class whom they both fear and despise.

There are undoubtedly some middle class girls who have fallen into the clutches of the gangs.  But on the whole the Muslim gangs live cheek-by-jowl with the white working class (and to some extent with working class blacks and Sikhs), and so the white working class are most ready to hand and most numerous. The working class are already despised by the salaried agents of the state, so these schoolgirls are not believed when they go to complain.  On top of that, the desire by the middle class to appear “non-racist” and politically correct would mean that these agents of the state would always give preferential treatment to a non-white immigrant than to a member of the white working class.  The chattering classes’ idea of diversity is to have any number of immigrants and foreigners appear on TV debates and even TV adverts, when it is vanishingly rare to see a representative of the working class be allowed to air an opinion in the media, even though the working class are by far the biggest demographic in the country.

What brings out the contrast most is to imagine the swiftness of the violent consequences if thousands of non-Muslim men in Britain had systematically raped and pimped thousands of Muslim schoolgirls.  Muslims would not have stood for this, as we have seen with the variety of forms of terrorism Muslims have employed for far less serious issues – riots, execution squads and suicide bombings over things as trivial as cartoons by non-Muslims.  But it appears that for 5 decades British men and women have just stood by and watched as the political elite and the agents of the state facilitated the industrial rape of schoolgirls.  The traditional institutions of the working class have been eviscerated (trade unions, churches, social clubs) by deliberate policies from the ruling elite and by technological change, resulting in the destruction of communal bonds and the fragmentation of a once homogeneous society.  With the destruction of these working class communities the media (and now social media) became the ways by which many understood what was going on in their own society.  The ruling elite are determined to bolster community bonds among immigrant populations whilst destroying the same bonds among the indigenous population – mosques which preach hatred of non-Muslims get state funding and charitable status, whilst pubs which welcome anyone are taxed on their sales and on their profits.  Pubs go out of business, often replaced by mosques. Muslims have the infrastructure and the ideological framework to organise violent responses at the drop of a hat.  The indigenous population have been weakened, fractured and betrayed by those who are in the position of leadership.  There are literally thousands of state-funded proponents of Islam. By contrast there are literally zero state-funded critics of Islam. That imbalance should leave people in no doubt where the state is heading.

If these indigenous communities and their organisations had not been so weakened since the 1960s, then we may have seen a violent response by the white working class to the rape of the girls of their community.  Since we now have proof that the Muslim rape gangs were operating back in the 1970s, it could well be that the so-called “Paki bashing” phenomenon of the 1970s was itself a response to the organised rape of schoolgirls by immigrants.  Our institutions (controlled by the middle class) have done nothing other than systematically deceive the public over the last 5 decades. To most people’s astonishment, there is considerable evidence to show that the indigenous population are disproportionately the victims of racist violence, with the grooming gangs being, in the single largest instance, the instigators of such racist violence.

Interview on a Christian Radio Show in the US

Janet Meffard does her research, even for a 30 minute slot like this. Very impressive. I had expected Americans to have very little understanding of the grooming gang problem, but Janet proved me wrong.

The link address is:

Interview with Sputnik News

A reasonable summary of the situation. Amazing to think that the mainstream media have now avoided this kind of analysis for some years.

In March 2018, shock and outrage surged across Britain as the true extent of a historic child sex abuse ring in Telford, Shropshire was uncovered in the mainstream media.

In what has since been dubbed the "worst ever" child abuse scandal in British history, as many as 1,000 young local girls may have been groomed for sex by a 200-strong syndicate of British-Asian men. Victims were said to have been trafficked, drugged, beaten, raped and in some cases even murdered.

While the scale of the criminal conspiracy, and the specific offenses involved, predictably sickened members of the public far and wide, so too did allegations local authorities knew about the problem in the early 1990s, and failed to maintain details of abusers in Asian communities for fear of being labeled racist.

Many social workers and victims testified Telford police and council were unwilling, unhelpful and sometimes intentionally obstructive of their efforts to report and prosecute perpetrators. In a particularly perverse instance, police failed to investigate a case five times until a member of parliament intervened — in another, a victim claimed officers discouraged her from pursuing her case after she told them she was speaking to journalists.
However, for those who have been researching the grooming phenomenon in the UK for some time, the Telford exposures were hardly revelatory. Among them is Peter McLoughlin, author of the 2014 work Easy Meat, which delved into the issue of grooming gangs in forensic detail.

For years, Peter believed grooming gangs to be a "racist myth", perpetuated by far-right demagogues. However, his fundamental assumptions were challenged in 2009 when he met people who said their children had been abused in this manner like this. These individuals' immediate and extended families had many non-white members — reasoning they were unlikely to be racists, He began to dig deeper into the issue. What he found shocked him.

The Grooming Phenomenon

Peter notes one of the "defining features" of grooming is the ethnic/cultural homogeneity of the gangs, and the refusal of members of their community to speak out about or condemn their behaviour.

Moreover, gangs are typically made up of brothers, and/or members of an extended family, who all take part in the grooming and/or rape of young girls. In the UK and in other countries affected by the phenomenon, the gangs are overwhelmingly men — and Muslim.

"In Britain, sexual abuse of children mostly involves white men — but the UK is 90 percent white. With grooming gangs, the prevalence of Muslims is so out of proportion with their numbers in Britain, ethnicity becomes highly significant. This reality must be addressed first and foremost when dealing with this crime. Islamic backgrounds dominate the profiles of ‘localized groomers', suggesting Muslim culture finds this crime far more acceptable than do other ethnicities in Britain," Peter told Sputnik.

Despite being widespread, Peter suggests British authorities have "deliberately ignored" the issue for decades — despite politicians, law enforcement agencies and officials, charities, social workers, academics and journalists being fully cognisant of the phenomenon for some time, grooming was rarely if ever documented by the mainstream media, the campaigns of child-care charities, official reports, or academic works. What accounts for this failure to acknowledge an undeniable reality?

"Stringent political correctness, and a fear of being labelled racist, ensured people didn't speak out,in the process enabling perpetrators to sexually abuse schoolgirls for decades with impunity. This, in an age where parents can be prosecuted for smacking their children! While the Rotherham scandal breaking ended this conspiracy of silence, it wasn't entirely shattered — the public know only a fraction of the true story. Grooming gangs are an epidemic in the UK, and have been operating for over 30 years," Peter told Sputnik.

Historical Precedents

Rotherham was, prior to Telford, home to the "biggest child protection scandal" in UK history. There, organized child sexual abuse continued almost unchallenged by legal authorities from the late 1980s to the early 2010s, with up to 1,400 children affected. The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing victims with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape victims' mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns. Several victims also became pregnant —one aged 12.

However, prior to the case making national headlines, the town had never been publicly associated with organized child abuse — although local government agencies there knew about local grooming gangs as early as 1996, when Rotherham council conducted an investigation into organized grooming.

Its resultant report identified most perpetrators as Pakistani Muslim men — Kurdish Muslims and Kosovan Muslims were also acknowledged to be responsible.

The next year, Rotherham council created a youth project, Risky Business, aimed at helping girls aged 11 — 25 at risk of sexual exploitation. Its chief, Jayne Senior, soon concluded a localized grooming network was operating in the town — and collected so much information about the perpetrators police suggested she start forwarding it to an electronic dropbox on the South Yorkshire Police computer network. Senior, who earned an MBE in 2016 for her role in uncovering the scandal, later learned that police did not read anything she submitted to the dropbox, and its contents could not be accessed by other forces.

Moreover, a 2010 internal Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board memo stated "great care will be taken in drafting this report to ensure its findings embrace Rotherham's qualities of diversity. It is imperative suggestions of a wider cultural phenomenon are avoided."

A 2013 independent inquiry headed by Professor Alexis Jay attributed official failure to address abuse in Rotherham to a number of factors relating to race, class and gender. These included contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward mostly working-class victims, fear perpetrators' ethnicity would trigger allegations of racism and damage community relations, the Labour council's reluctance to challenge a Labour-voting ethnic minority, and a desire to protect the town's reputation.

Inconvenient Truths

A palpable demonstration of how political correctness suppresses the truth about grooming gangs,Peter feels, occurred in 2004. In May that year, Channel 4 was preparing to broadcast a ‘Dispatches' documentary — Edge of the City — dealing with Muslim grooming gangs in Bradford, northern England.

The project was the culmination of an almost decade-long inquiry by director Anna Hall — she'd been contacted by the city's Barnardo's branch in October 1996, with a view to producing a film warning children and parents about a pattern of child sexual exploitation in the area. As Hall later recounted,local men were targeting girls aged-11 and up, giving them phones, and showering them with attention and affection — when they eventually had sex, the men would introduce their friends to the girls, and they would be coerced into sleeping with them too.

"Police seemed powerless to stop it because the girls thought these men were their boyfriends…the girls were white and the perpetrators were Asian.Men were gang-raping young girls and everybody wanted to pretend it wasn't happening. All anyone seemed concerned about was the risk of a race riot if we mentioned it," Hall has said.

It would be almost seven years before Hall began filming — and despite authorities of every stripe evidently being well-aware of the pestilential phenomenon,there were no arrests, much less prosecutions, in the intervening time.

The completed documentary could have changed that — and produced widespread public concern about Muslim grooming gangs. Hall states the film "dared" to describe the Bradford perpetrators as "overwhelmingly Asian".

However, after reviewing the documentary, Bradford council sought to block its broadcast. Colin Crampton, West Yorkshire's Chief Constable, successfully secured a postponement, on the basis it could impact the result of the impending local elections in Bradford, and potentially produce "race riots" — skirmishes between local youths, split along racial lines, had engulfed the city three years prior.

Peter's take on the incident is stark.

"A national broadcaster crumpled to pressure from an individual who should himself have been facing investigation for the failure of his underlings, and allowed the threat of massive violence by members of Bradford's Muslim community to temporarily suppress vital information. That this was allowed to happen because it could've influenced the outcome of an election beggars belief, and is a clear demonstration of how the UK is not a democracy in any meaningful sense," Peter told Sputnik.

No Coming Back?

In 2013, a House of Commons report acknowledged "localized grooming" was an issue in the UK, and the available evidence showed Muslims were hugely disproportionately represented among the perpetrators. However, the authors strongly implied the issue was restricted to towns that had been the subject of national scrutiny, such as Bradford and Rotherham.

Peter conversely believes there is reason to believe grooming is a national problem, with such gangs operating in "almost every major town in England" — in fact, he suggests it likely the only towns where gangs do not operate are those "without a mosque."What's more, he suspects authorities will only continue their cover-up of the nationwide scandal, producing many thousands of new victims across the UK every year.

"Easy Meat was an attempt to wake the public up, and get them to demand civilized solutions to the problem. I feared people could turn to vigilante justice to deal with it if politicians didn't act. However,I expect in ten years the book will still be years ahead of mainstream debate on this issue. Any hope I had of the country changing course has faded now. All one can do now is document the ongoing decline," Peter concludes.

Interview: Radio Sputnik

For decades the British state and the media have been complicit in ignoring the raped schoolgirls, whilst these organisations were more concerned with protecting the rapists (because the rapists were Muslims, protected by Islamic pressure groups, "spontaneous" Muslim riots, and by (supposedly unrelated) Islamic terrorism. From the rape of schoolgirls to the attacks by Jihadis - it is all part of the collective Muslim endeavour of imposing Islam on the dirty Kuffar (the unbeliever).

The link address is:

Every Day Muslims Collectively Denounce Jews & Christians

Here is a link to my interview with Audrey Russo last week. The interview was syndicated across American radio stations.

Sputnik Interview

Interested parties can get an idea of the direction in which my work is going

The link address is:

Nazir Afzal Radio 4 19th Oct 2018

He says that in 2008 the British police were told (from on high) that they were to regard the schoolgirls who were raped as if they were consenting adults. There are many falsehoods in his report, and the above is one of the few things he says which is likely to be true.

MP3 audio icon nazir-afzal-radio4-20181019.mp3 — MP3 audio, 2678 kB (2742708 bytes)

Labour's Children's Minister (2008) didn't know that "child prostitutes" were treated as criminals.

"We asked the Minister about one specific example of children being criminalised, namely as children involved in prostitution, a matter on which we have previously reported. We were alarmed that the Children’s Minister appeared to be unaware that children involved in prostitution are treated as criminals rather than victims" (p.23).

PDF document icon parliament-childrens-rights-2008-9.pdf — PDF document, 2454 kB (2513696 bytes)

Wolverhampton Council 2007 - Identifies Grooming Characteristsics

Looking at guidance coming from councils around that time, they were saying " NB Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 children under the age of 13 are considered of insufficient age to give consent to sexual activity." Thus, it appears that councils could take the cut-off years specified in the 2003 Act as a reason to ignore those over the age of 13. Yet when the Home Affairs Select Committee finally discussed the grooming gangs, they were emphatic that the age of consent was 16, and expressed shock that they had to remind people of this. Incredibly, in that document from Wolverhampton Council the go on to discusses power imbalances, children being sworn to secrecy, grooming, etc. (see pp.193-194) Clearly they were aware of all the characteristics of this problem, yet not one prosecution from 1988 (when first seen there) to 2008, nor from 2008 to 2018, when this document shows they clearly knew what to look for. Document has no internal dates, but PDF metadata shows it was created in 2007, modified in 2012. No revision history inside the document. Did they modify it once the grooming scandal could no longer be hidden?

PDF document icon Safeguarding Children Board (Wolverhampton).pdf — PDF document, 3832 kB (3924361 bytes)

Document Actions

Why Muslims Kill For Islam

The book has now been re-printed and customers all over the world can now buy Mohammed's Koran (the No.1 best-seller banned by Amazon).


If you wonder if the book Mohammed's Koran is for you, read the 100s of five-star reviews the book received in its first few months on sale.

Amazon banned the sale of the only book on Islam that proves Islam has been a terrorist ideology since Year 1 of the Islamic calendar.  The book denounces violence and hatred, yet has been described as offensive by Amazon.  Meanwhile Amazon still sell copies of "Mein Kampf" (which advocates gassing Jews) and Amazon still sell books like "The Anarchist Cookbook" which (a bomb-making manual, the possession of which has led to terrorism charges in the UK).  Ebay has even banned the sale of used copies of Mohammed's Koran.  And from day one Google banned adverts for the book (instead the UK government spent a small fortune buying the top advertising slot to push their video begging people not to read the book).  Amazon staff are on record as saying that the order to ban the book came "from above Amazon". The propaganda from the state and the censorship from their tax-avoiding chums confirms the argument of Mohammed's Koran - the elite have knowingly invited this terrorist ideology into the West and they have sided with the terrorist ideology against the victims of terrorism.

With all this censorship you may not have heard of my new book (co-authored with Tommy Robinson). It was published at the end of July 2017.  The book went straight to No.1 on Amazon, and stayed there until the initial print-run of 5000 books sold out a few days later. For most of the following 18 months it was the No.1 best-selling Koran.  Muslims hated this fact.

The British media never reported on the book going straight to No.1.  They only reported on the book once sales of it had been banned.  

`The Koran, Decoded

Contact Peter McLoughlin

Email pmclauth a t gmail . com

Considering that Twitter and Facebook have banned me, YouTube has removed entire channels, and Google deliberately promotes Islam in discussions of Islam and terrorism, it's only right to do my social networking on a site that really seems to stand by the concept of freedom of speech. You can find me at .