You are here: Home / Articles / Islam's Child Brides & Leftist Hypocrisy

Islam's Child Brides & Leftist Hypocrisy

Leftists exclude child brides from entering Europe as wives, but ignore the scandal of Islamic child brides within Europe. All to protect the Multiculturalist Con-Trick

As the Tsunami of (mostly Muslim) "refugees" sweeps across Europe in the last year or so, the media appear to be waking up to the conundrum of child brides in Islam. On the one hand, the Leftist position is to posture about cultural relativism and how all cultural values are equal. On the other hand, the Leftist position is to posture about the universal rights of children.  Whilst the posture of relativist values is kept at arms length from the posturing on universal values, the media can ignore how one part of their posturing ideology refutes the other part. 

Take Female Genital Mutilation. Two different laws were passed in the UK against this evil barbaric practice (1985, 2003). By the end of 2015, there had not been any Muslim parents prosecuted for breaking this law, despite their being estimates that over 100,000 women and girls living in the UK had suffered FGM. What did the Leftists do about this failure to apply protective laws to immigrant girls in the UK? The Leftists ignored it.  Analysis of the number of news reports in the UK's "quality press" between 1999 and 2013 shows that there were virtually no reports on FGM in that time. Bearing in mind that the second law against FGM was passed 5 years into this time-span, there were still almost zero reports on FGM each year!  The Leftist journalists simply would not discuss that FGM was occurring nor that the laws were being ignored. As with the organized gangs of Muslims grooming, raping and prostituting non-Muslim schoolgirls in England, with FGM the journalists simply pretended FGM was not happening. As I argue in Easy Meat, since 2015 the journalists have once again returned to ignoring the phenomenon of these organized gangs of predators across England.

In my book I pointed out that in 2012 a local newspaper in London, revealed that Muslim schoolgirls were being married off to old men by the girls' parents. 

London, England Islington girls forced into marriage at the age of nine - Islington Tribune, 2012,

The national media in the UK ignored these reports of what was going on in London, even though the hand-waving justifications from a supposedly state-sanctioned Imam are self-refuting (he says that these child marriages are un-Islamic but then says that under Islam a girl can be married off once she reaches puberty).

Is the pattern clear yet? A free and honest news media are supposedly a fundamental feature of a liberal democracy. But when it suits them, the news media are capable of concealing important social patterns for decades. We must then ask: if this is so, do we actually live in a liberal democracy, if one of the fundamental components is missing?  If there is one part of London that is likely to have a disproportionate number of Leftist journalists, academics and politicians living in it, that area is Islington. Yet strangely, the national media all failed to pick up on this story and all failed to ask the question: if it's happening in Islington, is it happening in Blackburn, Hull, Bristol, Leicester and Dover? Don't ask, don't tell. 

Roll on a few more years, and the Tsunami of (mostly Muslim) "refugees" washes across Europe. What do we find the national news media now being forced to report? The very same subject that was ignored in Islington in 2012: Islamic child brides.

Holland Refugee crisis: Nine-month pregnant 14-year-old goes missing amid anger the Netherlands is allowing child brides from Syria to seek asylum: Save the Children reported an 'alarming increase' in the number of child marriages within Syrian refugee communities - The Independent, 2015

Holland Migrant crisis: Dutch alarm over child brides from Syria - BBC Oct 2015,

 Holland CHILD brides as young as 12 have been ordered to stay with the men they were forced to marry after European officials agreed to recognise the partnerships.- Sunday Express, Oct 2015,

Did you notice a feminist outcry about Europe importing "rape culture"? Nope. Neither did I. The Leftist self-immolation was saved, by the Dutch government's plan to stop recognizing the legitimacy of these child-brides. The feminists could now continue to deceive the public that Islamic values were consistent with European values - the multiculturalist con-trick could continue. That Muslims regard these child-brides as legitimately married is kept from The Demos of the West. The deceit by the elite continues. 

But in 2016, another development of this story got virtually no coverage by the national media in Britain:

Denmark, Norway Danish imam urges govt to accept child marriages among refugees, Russia Today, 2016,

This Islamic scholar was opposing the actions of the European governments, because he wanted these child-brides not to be separated from their husbands:“It is an extraordinary humanitarian situation, and I think you have to take care of these families. They’re married, and even if the man is twice as old as they have built a family. We have to accept that it is a different culture, and we cannot destroy family life.”  After all, Mohammed the founder of Islam and the perfect example to Muslims whose behaviour (sunnah) must be copied to be a good Muslim, had a favourite wife (Aisha) who Mohammed married when she was a child.

This marginalized 2016 report has an Islamic expert exposing the contradiction between the Leftist posturing on cultural relativism with the supposed universal rights of children not to be sexually abused.  These child-brides are NOT to be recognized as being legally married to their much older husbands and are to be denied entry to Europe. The husbands are NOT to be prosecuted for having sex with children.  Moreover, do any of the multiculturalist Leftist feminists ask these child-brides which they would prefer: stay in an Islamic marriage to a much older Muslim man, or be denied refugee status because you are married and pregnant? Again, the Leftist, feminist journalists are silent on this question.

The multiculturalist con-trick must not be exposed: The Demos in these Democracies must not understand how fundamentally different is Islam.  Meanwhile, across the cities of Europe Muslims are quietly marrying off their own young girls, and no-one says a word. Just like they ignored the organized rape of non-Muslim schoolgirls for decades.

Why Muslims Kill For Islam

The book has now been re-printed and customers all over the world can now buy Mohammed's Koran (the No.1 best-seller banned by Amazon).


If you wonder if the book Mohammed's Koran is for you, read the 100s of five-star reviews the book received in its first few months on sale.

Amazon banned the sale of the only book on Islam that proves Islam has been a terrorist ideology since Year 1 of the Islamic calendar.  The book denounces violence and hatred, yet has been described as offensive by Amazon.  Meanwhile Amazon still sell copies of "Mein Kampf" (which advocates gassing Jews) and Amazon still sell books like "The Anarchist Cookbook" which (a bomb-making manual, the possession of which has led to terrorism charges in the UK).  Ebay has even banned the sale of used copies of Mohammed's Koran.  And from day one Google banned adverts for the book (instead the UK government spent a small fortune buying the top advertising slot to push their video begging people not to read the book).  Amazon staff are on record as saying that the order to ban the book came "from above Amazon". The propaganda from the state and the censorship from their tax-avoiding chums confirms the argument of Mohammed's Koran - the elite have knowingly invited this terrorist ideology into the West and they have sided with the terrorist ideology against the victims of terrorism.

With all this censorship you may not have heard of my new book (co-authored with Tommy Robinson). It was published at the end of July 2017.  The book went straight to No.1 on Amazon, and stayed there until the initial print-run of 5000 books sold out a few days later. For most of the following 18 months it was the No.1 best-selling Koran.  Muslims hated this fact.

The British media never reported on the book going straight to No.1.  They only reported on the book once sales of it had been banned.  

`The Koran, Decoded

Contact Peter McLoughlin

Email pmclauth a t gmail . com

Considering that Twitter and Facebook have banned me, YouTube has removed entire channels, and Google deliberately promotes Islam in discussions of Islam and terrorism, it's only right to do my social networking on a site that really seems to stand by the concept of freedom of speech. You can find me at .